Tuesday, February 09, 2010

Scala is Java, or how to grow to love the bomb

Twitter's Nick Kallen posts Why I love everything you hate about Java, a satisfying read about Scala, scaling and design patterns in the real world. More authors (including myself) should post like this.

That he dispenses with explanation why a Java article is really about Scala evidences this fact: Scala is Java, or what Java could have become in a better universe.

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Snakes on the backplane

This presentation is so delightful, I weep that I was not present. And when I thought it could not get better, I learned the term duck-punching. Where have I been?

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Scala on Cygwin: Help from Andrew Beacock

Andrew Beacock posts exactly the advice I needed: how to get the scala prompt working on Cygwin. Thanks!

Google has the best Java engineers

Are you reading Jeremy Manson? Why not? (Hint: yet another reason finalizers are wrong even if Gosling won't say it. Alternatives here.)

Monday, February 01, 2010

Against magic

A wonderful post against magic by Stephan Schmidt.

Remember: If you don't understand it, don't use it.

Monday, January 25, 2010

The Rosetta stone, what a paper

I am really enjoying this paper by John Baez (yes, that John Baez) and Mike Stay. My background is in physics (and music) and the crossing of physics, topology, logic and computation is too much to keep to myself. I hope you enjoy it, too.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Update on Google Phone saga

An update from Google on my continuing Google phone quest:

XXX YYY has posted an answer to the question "Ineligible to purchase phone: T-mobile contract changed too recently": Howdy binkley, We've listened very carefully to everyone's feedback and concerns regarding the upgrade issue and are working with our partners to improve the situation for existing customers. In all instances, Google's web store only passes your information along. The carrier then determines eligibility for a full or partial upgrade, as your service contract is with the carrier. You must be fully upgrade eligible in order to get this device at a discount. Stay tuned for more updates about upgrading! In the meantime, you can use the sticky post at the top of this forum to get the latest information and share any more thoughts you may have: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Mobile/thread?tid=3c0fd3870ec370a8&#all Cheers, -XXX

UPDATE: I've received a variant of this text in a second message from another Google employee. It's good they are trying to deal with this mess. I should not be surprised at the form letter template employees work from.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Rusty Java: in-place updating a collection while iterating

Some areas of my Java grow rusty with time, as with all things. This code looks nice, but completely fails:

public static void main(final String... args) {
    final Set<Foo> foos = new HashSet<Foo>(asList(FOO));

    for (final Foo foo : foos)
        foos.addAll(foo.more);

    System.out.println("foos = " + new HashSet<Foo>(foos));
}

enum Foo {
    QUUX,
    BAZ(QUUX),
    BAR(BAZ),
    FOO(BAR, BAZ);

    private final Set<Foo> more;

    Foo(final Foo... more) {
        this.more = new HashSet<Foo>(asList(more));
    }
}

The goal is to collect all transitive dependencies. What is wrong?

The iterator is not a "current picture" of the collection; it is a snapshot. This code prints only foos = [FOO], updates vanish. Changing to ArrayList only worsens things with the dreaded ConcurrentModificationException.

Correct is to use a list iterator and be careful with cursor position:

public static void main(final String... args) {
    final List<Foo> foos = new ArrayList<Foo>(asList(FOO));
    final ListIterator<Foo> lit = foos.listIterator();

    while (lit.hasNext())
        for (final Foo foo : lit.next().more) {
            lit.add(foo);
            lit.previous();
        }

    System.out.println("foos = " + new HashSet<Foo>(foos));
}

This prints foos = [QUUX, BAZ, BAR, FOO] with the happy side effect of depth-first ordering.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Class token nuisance

Fabrizio Giudici posts a nice description of type-safe map keys, a clever way to simplify life for an API user.

It exposes one of the nuisances of class tokens:

@Nonnull
public <T> T get (final @Nonnull Key<T> key)
  throws NotFoundException
  {
    return NotFoundException.throwWhenNull(
        (T)itemMap.get(key), "Not found: " + key);
  }

(Kudos to him for using JSR-305 annotations.)

See the cast (T)? That generates a compile-time warning (link just one of many complaints around this). The correct way to get ride of this warning is to use a class token:

@Nonnull
public <T> T get (final @Nonnull Key<T> key)
  throws NotFoundException
  {
    return NotFoundException.throwWhenNull(
        key.cast(itemMap.get(key)), "Not found: " + key);
  }

Where the Key<T> type is redefined:

@Immutable
public final static class Key<T>
    implements Comparable<Key<T>>
  {
    @Nonnull
    private final String name;
    @Nonnull
    private final Class<T> type;

    protected Key (final @Nonnull String name, final @Nonnull Class<T> type)
      {
        this.name = name;
        this.type = type;
      }

    public T cast(final Object that)
      {
        return type.cast(that);
      }

    @Override
    public int compareTo (final @Nonnull Key<T> other) { ... }

    @Override
    public boolean equals (final @CheckForNull Object object) { ... }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() { ... }
  }

What a nuisance.

Saturday, January 09, 2010

ANI, not your usual language

This is interesting: anic, a compiler for the language ANI. It is really the language which is the interesting part, of course.

ANI is automatically parallelizing, and very non-inperative. In its own buzzwords: experimental, high-performance, statically-safe, fully implicitly parallel, object-oriented, general-purpose dataflow programming language.

Take a breath now.

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Bad fanboi - no gphone

Continuing my Nexus One story...

So far I cannot get a Google phone. At first the site did not like my T-mobile family plan. So I went from $60/mo. to $130/mo. to break up our plan into a his/hers data/voice plan.

Now Google still does not like my T-mobile plan:

You are not eligible for an upgrade at this time.
You are not eligible because your current contract was initiated too recently.

No love from Google.

IntelliJ and Scala

Thomas Jung writes about using IntelliJ and Scala and is very enthusiastic, as he should be: IntelliJ IDEA remains the best IDE.

I've long been pessimistic of IDEA retaining this position in the face of thousands of Eclipse code monkeys eventually typing the works of Knuth, but JetBrains has admirably kept up.

The struggle between the cathedral and the bazaar continues.

UPDATE: When it rains, it pours.